STUDY GUIDE ON "STANDING" (Revised 2003)
As you read or review the material on "standing," consider the following questions. The answers can be found in the material as noted.
1. Which of the following are currently valid theories in determining the ability of a party to successfully suppress evidence sought to be introduced against him or her on Fourth Amendment grounds?
Standing |
Rakas , D&T 446-47, 453, 456 |
Legitimately on the premises |
Rakas , D&T 447-48 |
Target standing |
Rakas , D&T 446 |
Co-conspirator standing |
Alderman, D&T 442-43 |
Legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched |
Rakas , D&T 448-49; Carter, D&T 456 |
Automatic standing based on ownership of item seized |
Rawlings, D&T 463-64 |
Automatic standing based on being charged with a possessory offense |
Rakas dissent |
2. Which of the following factors are relevant to finding a legitimate expectation of privacy sufficient to challenge a search or seizure?
ownership of premises/property |
Rakas , D&T 448, fn 11; Rawlings, D&T 463-64 |
right to exclude |
Rakas , D&T 449 |
longstanding social custom |
Olson , D&T 454 |
expectation must have source outside 4th A. |
Rakas , D&T 448, fn 12 |
commercial v. personal presence at site |
Carter , D&T 457 |
length of time on premises |
Carter , D&T 457 |
illegal activities engaged in at the site |
Carter dissent, D&T 462 |
previous connection with premises |
Carter , D&T 457 |
3. Who has the burden of proving "standing"? Alderman, D&T 442-43; Rakas, D&T 445, fn 1.
4. When a passenger seeks to suppress evidence found in the search of a car, what strategic decision does the individual have to make regarding what to challenge? Why is that decision important? See Rakas, D&T 450, fn. 5 and D&T 454, Problem 5D.