|
 |
Inside the Supreme Court
Petition to Decision
Papers of Supreme Court
Justices on Civil Rights Cases
|
David Achtenberg
Professor &
Law Foundation Scholar
UMKC School of Law
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
816-235-2382
AchtenbergD@umkc.edu |
|
Coming Attractions
|
Coming
Soon |
|
Spring
2013:
Entirely New Case Files
|
Jett v.
Dallas
Independent
School
District
(§
1983
supersedes
42 USC
§
1981 as to
suits
against
governmental
actors)
|
Adding Newly
Available
Papers to
Existing
Case Files |
|
Owen v. City
of
Independence
(A complete
set of the
newly
available
Potter
Stewart
Papers
relating to
Owen
should
be added
this
Spring.)
Monell v.
Department
of Social
Services
(Complete
sets of the
newly
available
Byron White
and Potter
Stewart
Papers
relating to
Monell
should
be added
this Spring
or early
Summer.)
|
|
|
The Long Range Plan |
The first phase of the
Petition to Decision
website is essentially a pilot for a larger,
long range project. The first
phase cases all dealt with a cluster of
issues surrounding
§ 1983
suits against cities,
school districts, and other governmental
entities: Can they be sued at all
under the statute? What are the limits
on their liability? What are the
elements of various theories of municipal
liability? What special defenses, if
any, do local governments have? Are
states different? The first phase can
be seen as a digital chapter dealing with
the Supreme Court’s internal struggles over
these questions.
The long range plan is for
Petition to Decision
to have digital chapters on the
Court’s internal handling of a number of
other important
§ 1983. Future
phases may include chapters on various
issues such as:
- Official Immunity:
Section 1983 permits suits against state and local officials, but is it fair for them to be sued if they acted in good faith? What if an official made an understandable mistake because, at the time he or she acted, the constitutional issue was unclear or had not yet been resolved?
- Color of Law: Section 1983 permits suits only if the defendant was acting "under color of" state or local law. Can an official be acting "under color of law" even though his or her actions are not authorized by state or local law? What if those actions clearly violate state law? Can private individuals, not employed by any governmental body, ever act "under color of" law?
- Remedies: Section 1983 provides that a person whose rights have been violated can bring an "action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress." How should damages be measured in such an action? Are punitive damages available? If so, for what sort of conduct? What other remedies are available?
- Preclusion: Section 1983 was intended to create a federal cause of action for violation of federally protected rights. Should the plaintiff be bound by factual findings made in previous state court proceeding? Should plaintiffs sometimes lose the right to bring their § 1983 causes of action because they failed to assert them in previous state court proceedings? What will be the effect of decisions by other sorts of tribunals, e.g., arbitrators or state administrative agencies?
|
|
|