|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collins Timeline—Part
1 |
|
|
Deciding to Grant Review: First Filings to
Grant of Certiorari (1/31/91-4/15/91) |
|
|
|
|
Documents |
|
|
Event |
Date |
HAB |
TM |
BRW |
Other |
|
|
Petition for Certiorari filed |
01/31/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Petition |
|
|
Brief in Opposition filed |
03/14/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
BIO |
|
|
Petition and Brief in Opposition distributed
to chambers for April 12, 1991 Conference |
03/20/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
SDO's clerk IA circulates memo to pool
recommending grant of certiorari due to
circuit split on important issue |
03/25/91 |
Memo IA to Pool |
|
|
|
|
|
TM's clerk JEC writes memo to TM recommending
joining 3 based on "fuzzy" circuit split. |
03/29/91 |
|
Memo JEC to TM |
|
|
|
|
TM annotates memo from JEC indicating he will
join 3. |
03/30/91 |
|
Memo JEC to TM |
|
|
|
|
HAB's clerk AJ annotates pool memo.
He recommends denial on the basis
that the circuit split is shallow and the
case presents the issue on "poor facts." |
04/01/91 |
Memo IA to Pool |
|
|
|
|
|
Reply Brief of Petitioner filed |
04/01/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Cert Reply |
|
|
HAB clerk AJ annotates pool memo in response
to reply brief. He recognizes case is
certworthy due to split on issue that will
recur, but recommends denial because of poor
facts. |
04/05/91 |
Memo IA to Pool |
|
|
|
|
|
Case discussed in certiorari conference.
WHR, HAB, JPS, & DHS vote to deny.
BRW, AGS, & AMK vote to grant.
TM & SDO vote to join 3.
Certiorari granted. |
04/12/91 |
|
TM Docket |
|
|
|
|
Order granting certiorari issued. |
04/15/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collins Timeline—Part
2 |
|
|
Briefing, Argument & Decision on the Merits
(4/15/91-11/8/91) |
|
|
|
|
Documents |
|
|
Event |
Date |
HAB |
TM |
BRW |
Other |
|
|
Record filed |
04/15/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Further record filed |
05/07/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Petitioner granted additional time until
June 18 to file file brief on the merits |
05/16/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Brief of Petitioner filed |
06/18/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Petitioner Brief |
|
|
Joint Appendix filed |
06/18/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Jt App |
|
|
Brief of Amicus NEA filed |
06/18/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Brief NEA |
|
|
Brief of Amicus ATLA filed |
06/18/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Brief ATLA |
|
|
Brief of Amicus ACLU filed |
06/18/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Brief ACLU |
|
|
Respondent granted additional time until
August 9 to file brief on the merits |
06/26/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
TM announces his retirement effective on
qualification of his successor |
06/28/91 |
|
|
|
Retirement Press Conference Video |
|
|
Brief of Respondent filed |
08/09/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Respondent Brief |
|
|
Brief of Amicus National League of Cities
filed |
08/09/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
League Brief |
|
|
Briefs circulated to chambers |
08/21/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Petitioner applies to extend time for reply
brief from September 9 to September 17 |
08/23/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
AGS denies application to extent time for
reply brief |
08/30/13 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Case set for argument on November 5, 1991 |
09/05/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Reply brief filed |
09/09/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Reply Brief |
|
|
Petitioner moves to supplement record |
09/13/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Motion to supplement record granted |
10/21/91 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
HAB clerk MM writes bench memo to HAB
recommending reversal on the basis that
there is no "abuse of governmental power"
requirement and remanding to let lower court
decide the constitutional deprivation issue.
She discusses the constitutional issue at
length and also the question of whether the
city should be liable under Monell.
She recommends reversal. |
10/21/91 |
Memo MM to HAB |
|
|
|
|
|
CT assumes office succeeding TM |
10/23/91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAB prepares handwritten notes for oral
argument suggesting that he wants to reverse
on the basis that there is no "abuse of
governmental authority" requirement, and
remand to let the Court of Appeals initially
decide whether there had been a
constitutional deprivation. |
10/29/91 |
HAB Pre-Arg Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Transcript |
|
|
|
|
|
MM writes memo just before argument that
case could be dismissed (perhaps DIG'd) |
11/04/91 |
Memo MM to HAB(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
HAB annotates November 4 memo |
11/04/91 |
Memo MM to HAB(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
HAB annotates his 10/29/91 handwritten notes
suggesting that he now believes the case
will have to be affirmed |
11/04/91 |
HAB Pre-Arg Notes
Transcript |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case argued |
11/05/91 |
HAB Arg Notes |
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Transcript |
|
|
Audio & Transcript |
|
|
Case discussed in conference.
Court votes to affirm 7-2.
Majority somewhat split on rationale. |
11/08/91 |
HAB Conf Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Transcript |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collins
Timeline—Part 3 |
|
|
Drafting the Opinions: From First Drafts to
Final Opinions (12/30/91-2/26/92) |
|
|
|
|
Documents |
|
|
Event |
Date |
HAB |
TM |
BRW |
Other |
|
|
JPS circulates first draft of opinion |
12/30/91 |
|
|
JPS 1st Draft |
|
|
|
BRW annotates first draft of opinion with
note indicating he will dissent. |
01/02/92 |
|
|
JPS 1st Draft |
|
|
|
CT writes JPS that he will join opinion |
01/02/92 |
Memo CT to JPS |
|
Memo CT to JPS |
|
|
|
WHR writes JPS that he will join opinion |
01/03/92 |
Memo WHR to JPS |
|
Memo WHR to JPS |
|
|
|
HAB's clerk MM write memo to HAB expressing
concerns about JPS opinion and indicating
that BRW is considering writing separately.
She disagrees with JPS's rationale
although not entirely with the result. |
01/05/92 |
Memo MM to HAB |
|
|
|
|
|
SDO writes JPS that she will join opinion |
01/08/92 |
Memo SDO to JPS |
|
Memo SDO to JPS |
|
|
|
JPS circulates second draft of opinion |
01/15/92 |
|
|
JPS 2nd Draft |
|
|
|
BRW annotates JPS second draft indicating
that he will join |
01/16/92 |
|
|
JPS 2nd Draft |
|
|
|
BRW writes JPS that he will join opinion. |
01/16/92 |
Memo BRW to JPS |
|
Memo BRW to JPS |
|
|
|
DHS writes JPS that he will join opinion |
01/16/92 |
Memo DHS to JPS |
|
Memo DHS to JPS |
|
|
|
JPS circulates third draft of opinion |
01/23/92 |
JPS 3rd Draft |
|
JPS 3rd Draft |
|
|
|
AMK writes JPS that he will join opinion but
suggests changes to the third sentence of
the third paragraph on page 3. |
01/27/92 |
Memo AMK to JPS |
|
Memo AMK to JPS |
|
|
|
HAB writes JPS that he will join opinion |
01/27/92 |
Memo HAB to JPS |
|
Memo HAB to JPS |
|
|
|
JPS circulates fourth draft of opinion
incorporating changes suggested by AMK. |
01/28/92 |
|
|
JPS 4th Draft |
|
|
|
AGS writes JPS that he will join opinion |
01/28/92 |
Memo AGS to JPS |
|
Memo AGS to JPS |
|
|
|
Decision handed down and opinion announced
by JPS |
02/26/92 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion Announcement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collins Timeline—Part 4 |
|
|
After the Decision: Post-Decision Events
(3/27/92-4/16/92) |
|
|
|
|
Documents |
|
|
Event |
Date |
HAB |
TM |
BRW |
Other |
|
|
Judgment issued |
03/27/92 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
Record returned to Fifth Circuit |
04/16/92 |
|
|
|
Docket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|